The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

check(0) → zero
check(s(0)) → odd
check(s(s(0))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0) → 0
half(s(0)) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0)
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0) → 0
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.

(2) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(3) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Infered types.

(4) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

(5) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
check, half, plus, timesIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
check < timesIter
half < timesIter
plus < timesIter

(6) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
check, half, plus, timesIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
check < timesIter
half < timesIter
plus < timesIter

(7) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Induction Base:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, 0)))) →_R^Ω(1)
odd

Induction Step:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, +(n5_0, 1))))) →_R^Ω(1)
check(s(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n5_0)))) →_IH
odd

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(8) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(9) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
half, plus, timesIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
half < timesIter
plus < timesIter

(10) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)

Induction Base:
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, 0))) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, +(n249_0, 1)))) →_R^Ω(1)
s(half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0)))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s3_0(c250_0))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(11) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(12) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
plus, timesIter

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
plus < timesIter

(13) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n571_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n571_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n571₀)

Induction Base:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
gen_0':s3_0(b)

Induction Step:
plus(gen_0':s3_0(+(n571_0, 1)), gen_0':s3_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
s(plus(gen_0':s3_0(n571_0), gen_0':s3_0(b))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s3_0(+(b, c572_0)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(14) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(15) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n571_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n571_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n571₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
timesIter

(16) NoRewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol timesIter.

(17) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n571_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n571_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n571₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(18) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(19) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(20) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)
plus(gen_0':s3_0(n571_0), gen_0':s3_0(b)) → gen_0':s3_0(+(n571_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n571₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(21) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(22) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(23) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)
half(gen_0':s3_0(*(2, n249_0))) → gen_0':s3_0(n249_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n249₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(24) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(25) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)

(26) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
check(0') → zero
check(s(0')) → odd
check(s(s(0'))) → even
check(s(s(s(x)))) → check(s(x))
half(0') → 0'
half(s(0')) → 0'
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0', y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(x, y) → timesIter(x, y, 0')
timesIter(x, y, z) → if(check(x), x, y, z, plus(z, y))
p(s(x)) → x
p(0') → 0'
if(zero, x, y, z, u) → z
if(odd, x, y, z, u) → timesIter(p(x), y, u)
if(even, x, y, z, u) → plus(timesIter(half(x), y, half(z)), timesIter(half(x), y, half(s(z))))

Types:
check :: 0':s → zero:odd:even
0' :: 0':s
zero :: zero:odd:even
s :: 0':s → 0':s
odd :: zero:odd:even
even :: zero:odd:even
half :: 0':s → 0':s
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
timesIter :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
if :: zero:odd:even → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_zero:odd:even1_0 :: zero:odd:even
hole_0':s2_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s3_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s3_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s3_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s3_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(27) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
check(gen_0':s3_0(+(1, *(2, n5_0)))) → odd, rt ∈ Ω(1 + n5₀)

(28) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)